Date: 13 Mar 2002 20:26:17 -0800 From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: X11 required for Document Project? Message-ID: <cvlmcv93me.mcv@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20020314014952.45C7C3E3C@bazooka.trit.org> References: <20020314014952.45C7C3E3C@bazooka.trit.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> writes:
> "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote:
> > The full list of packages needed by docproj (minus jadetex and its
> > dependencies) is in /usr/src/release/Makefile.inc.docports.
> ^^^^
> I think you mean "should be in". For example, python isn't listed.
> This file is a good idea, but it gets out of date despite our best
> efforts.
In case anyone doesn't know about "pkg_tree" or "portupgrade -nR":
pkg_tree -v docproj | grep -v docproj | tr -d '|\\_ ' | sort -u
gives a list of dependencies. (I wouldn't think "-v" should be needed,
but without it, XFree86 and python were omitted.)
I notice several differences on my STABLE-05-mar system:
Only Makefile.inc.docport has
Mk
unzip
gettext
gmake
libtool
ghostscript-gnu
docbook
while only pkg_tree (on my sys about 05'mar) gives
XFree86
XFree86-libraries
docbook
ghostscript-afpl **probably my fault
imake
jade
python
xhtml
Then I tried "portupgrade -nR":
Only Makefile.inc.docport has
Mk
unzip
gettext
gmake
libtool
ghostscript-gnu
while only "portupgrade -nR" (on my sys about 05'mar) gives
imake-4
ghostscript-afpl
jade
xhtml
XFree86-4-libraries
I think my ports are in good shape (but a week old).
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cvlmcv93me.mcv>