Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:58:03 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues Message-ID: <20031129225803.GA10325@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpr7zqer5u.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200311281553.hASFrURT003309@siralan.org> <86fzg8scn5.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> <20031129142508.GA46034@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <xzpvfp3dz28.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20031129212512.GB8768@xor.obsecurity.org> <xzpr7zqer5u.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes: > > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > That is very, very bad. I wish we had some kind of ports QA team :( > > Well, er, a number of us do essentially nothing BUT ports QA. >=20 > Do you actually review ports Makefiles? Not pre-review, but post-review, certainly. We also have an cluster of ~25 machines and a number of ports committers who spend their days detecting and fixing problems with the ports collection. Kris --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/ySR7Wry0BWjoQKURAoIdAKCM2x1LtBEBUu73crcsLvPkKp/htgCgiJWu VkUOZXKGr4EfRQjetNB1NJU= =5H3J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031129225803.GA10325>