Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Dec 2003 18:41:46 +0300
From:      "toxa" <postfix@sendmail.ru>
To:        "Andre Guibert de Bruet" <andy@siliconlandmark.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: CURRENT state of modules
Message-ID:  <001201c3c18f$9ee88af0$0202a8c0@karputer>
References:  <200312121910.14245.postfix@sendmail.ru> <20031213091736.C44419@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>
> Kernel modules introduce a number of possible failure paths and an avenue
> for malicious code to be loaded. As such, some might determine that the
> flexibility isn't worth it for their production online systems. If uptime
> and stability is that big a concern, you probably shouldn't be running
> CURRENT in the first place. ;)
>
> Regards,
>
> > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant >
> > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/    >

The main point is to get all hardware working properly on my lovely vaio
laptop, this is not production server as you guess :)
I get it all working under linux already (even softmodem) and now my will is
to get it all working  under my favourite  OS, so current is my state :-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001201c3c18f$9ee88af0$0202a8c0>