Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Apr 2025 21:27:12 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        wireless@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 280546] iwlwifi panic in BT COEX code
Message-ID:  <bug-280546-21060-rncKpZqIlj@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-280546-21060@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280546

--- Comment #29 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:

URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=a8a47a41775b0320606f90b3ac2048bc23494615

commit a8a47a41775b0320606f90b3ac2048bc23494615
Author:     Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@FreeBSD.org>
AuthorDate: 2025-04-08 23:05:43 +0000
Commit:     Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2025-04-11 21:26:05 +0000

    LinuxKPI: 802.11: add a lchanctx list to lhw

    While we are currently only supporting a single VAP (vif) it is
    less of a trouble but in order to get locking and rcu accesses
    [from drivers] more right add a list for all chanctx_conf we have
    for one hw.  Use that list in the iterator function to avoid
    having to lock the vif but not protecting the chanctx list
    (against a parallel removal) due to different locking.

    Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation
    PR:             280546
    MFC after:      3 days
    Tested by:      Oleksandr Kryvulia (shuriku shurik.kiev.ua)
    Tested by:      Oleg Nauman (oleg.nauman gmail.com) [rtw88]
    Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D49734

 sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_80211.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++----------
 sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_80211.h |  5 ++++
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280546-21060-rncKpZqIlj>