Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 12:56:30 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Heikki Suonsivu <hsu@clinet.fi>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: i386/9341: tty-level buffer overflows Message-ID: <199901061956.MAA17107@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <19990106135449.C25289@futuresouth.com> References: <199901060451.UAA12400@hub.freebsd.org.newsgate.clinet.fi> <x2btkc7acq.fsf@katiska.clinet.fi> <199901061636.JAA13961@mt.sri.com> <19990106132502.B25289@futuresouth.com> <199901061932.MAA16917@mt.sri.com> <19990106135449.C25289@futuresouth.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I'll bet you have crappy UARTS that claim to be 16550's, but in fact are > > some sort of clone that doesn't work well. That UARTS on my laptop are > > not real either, although I get about 57600 on it w/out problems. > > > > And, a 486/25 is not exactly a speed daemon. :) > > It's an IBM ThinkPad 350C, if that tells anyone anything. > I wouldn't be surprised at all if they were crappy UARTS, and you ain't > gotta tell ME 486/25 is slow (I run X on it, after all... ;), but c'mon; > this is *19,200* baud!! I'd think even a 486/25 should be able to handle > that without puking this much. With crappy UARTS you're lucky to get 9600 baud if you've got X on the box. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901061956.MAA17107>