Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:10:12 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Przemys=B3aw_Celej?= <p-celej@o2.pl> To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel panic with ACPI enabled Message-ID: <43E928D4.5030500@o2.pl> In-Reply-To: <200602071404.44314.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <43E7D1A2.1030008@o2.pl> <200602071048.56326.jhb@freebsd.org> <200602071237.31791.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> <200602071404.44314.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 07 February 2006 13:37, Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > >> On Tuesday 07 February 2006 09:48, John Baldwin wrote: >> >>> [cut] >> I have a few things. Is there a reason you have 'device apm'? Are you >> trying to use APM and ACPI at the same time? Why do you have 'device >> isa' rather than 'device eisa'? Where you, by any chance, just re-using >> your conf file from 5.x? It kind of looks that way. Have you looked at >> i386/conf/NOTES? There is some more information in there. >> > > device isa is normal, and he probably just commented out eisa since modern > systems don't have EISA slots. The apm thing won't hurt, though it probably > adds a small bit of bloat to the kernel. If you have both apm and acpi then > acpi will be used if it is present, otherwise if acpi is not present (or is > disabled) then apm will be used. > Without 'device apm', was the same problem. I used APM instead of ACPI. But now this is never mind, the problem was solved; see above post. -- Pozdrawiam Przemysław Celej
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43E928D4.5030500>