Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:01:20 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: eik@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues Message-ID: <xzpn0aeeq4f.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20031129225803.GA10325@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:58:03 -0800") References: <200311281553.hASFrURT003309@siralan.org> <86fzg8scn5.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> <20031129142508.GA46034@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <xzpvfp3dz28.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20031129212512.GB8768@xor.obsecurity.org> <xzpr7zqer5u.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20031129225803.GA10325@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > Do you actually review ports Makefiles? > Not pre-review, but post-review, certainly. We also have an cluster > of ~25 machines and a number of ports committers who spend their days > detecting and fixing problems with the ports collection. Well, in that case I'll ammend my comment to "I wish our ports QA team had more time and resources" :) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpn0aeeq4f.fsf>