Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:08:49 +0000
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 222872] lang/ruby3{1,2,3}: Fails to build with POSIX-compliant sh -c
Message-ID: <bug-222872-21402-EG4NIkRLuC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-222872-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-222872-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222872 --- Comment #18 from John Hein <jcfyecrayz@liamekaens.com> --- (In reply to Koichiro Iwao from comment #17) > Are any other QA tests required? No required QA tests that I know of. It is worthwhile to test and confirm that this change works with both older, non-compliant, /bin/sh and compliant shell implementations (and mention thi= s in the commit message). For what it's worth, I have tested this and confirmed this is true on older, now EOL, versions of FreeBSD (back to 4.x) through t= he the latest FreeBSD /bin/sh. But feel free to independently do some testing. Unrelated to this change, portclippy suggests different ordering of element= s in the Makefile. While here, a separate commit could be made to address those (separate to keep formatting changes from distracting from the meaningful on-topic change). But that's not at all required. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-222872-21402-EG4NIkRLuC>