Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 07:58:17 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAL on FreeBSD 5.5 redux Message-ID: <200702090758.18317.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1171000334.67014.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <200702090634.56455.lofi@freebsd.org> <1171000334.67014.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart22118365.54UmBZqpjV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday, 9. February 2007 06:52, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > There was a recent change that went into HAL to favor atapicam > installations over those without. I wonder if this could be causing > problems. Please provide an lshal. Oh, and I really should mention this, the atapicam devices work fine with t= he=20 current HAL, the problems are just with the atapicd devices (i.e. with=20 atapicam turned off, that was the regression testing I did). Cheers, =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart22118365.54UmBZqpjV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFzBuKXhc68WspdLARAgheAKCkjUibd4IStsno2255wJmWB8g1JQCdFiDT qshFJOKpRemuXVgCZp345LU= =LHUy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart22118365.54UmBZqpjV--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702090758.18317.lofi>