Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:02:05 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook Makefile book.sgml chapters.ent doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/nanobsd Makefile chapter.sgml Message-ID: <1545851395.20060507170205@rulez.sk> In-Reply-To: <20060507144535.GB42180@gothmog.pc> References: <200605041621.k44GL8nq038941@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060506.183310.122598445.hrs@allbsd.org> <20060507144535.GB42180@gothmog.pc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Giorgos, Sunday, May 7, 2006, 4:45:35 PM, you wrote: > On 2006-05-06 18:33, Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> Hmm, what do you think about moving this chapter to a separate >> article? I think it is better than one of the chapters in >> Handbook because this is somewhat independent and not an >> average system admin's task compared to the other ones in Part III. > You're right about the placement. We sort of talked a bit about > the right place for the NanoBSD stuff in #bsddocs, but didn't > come up with anything IIRC. > [Cc:'ing Daniel too] > I'm ok with moving the NanoBSD stuff in an article. It will > probably look better this way. If that's better than its current > position, I can take care of moving it. > Daniel, what do you think? Should we move it to an article? I have no real objections, although I like it more in Handbook, but if a more experienced doc@ people think it's better to keep it away from it as an article, it's completely okay with me. > Thanks, > Giorgos -- Sincerely yours, Daniel Gerzo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1545851395.20060507170205>