Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:58:28 -0500 From: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Difference in "netstat -rn" output in the last 2 months Message-ID: <3ee5884e-f1e5-4911-bc07-6fd8b5460bb3@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Z5uwlgOghc0X2Ob-@cell.glebi.us> References: <b529fbae8f4f4ed96dab86d11995f4b9@Leidinger.net> <Z5uwlgOghc0X2Ob-@cell.glebi.us>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 1/30/2025 12:02 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 04:58:57PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > A> something has changed in the output of "netstat -rn" between > A> 2024-11-23-195545 and 2025-01-22-151306. The default route is not listed as > A> "default" anymore, but with "0.0.0.0" resp. "::/0". This breaks some tools > A> (e.g. iocage). Iocage uses python, I'm not sure if it uses netstat or some > A> other interface, so it may not be directly related to netstat itself but > A> could be related to some other stuff (netlink maybe?). > A> > A> Does this ring a bell for someone? > > I created review to restore the default behavior and make new behavior > optional: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D48729 > Hi Gleb, Thanks for catching this while I was traveling. I agree that too many things break with this change, and it makes sense to put the new behaviour behind the double flag (-nn). -- Allan Judehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3ee5884e-f1e5-4911-bc07-6fd8b5460bb3>