Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:47:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194985] getdtablecount new syscall from openbsd Message-ID: <bug-194985-8-Y71fcatwYU@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-194985-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-194985-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194985 --- Comment #6 from Mateusz Guzik <mjg@FreeBSD.org> --- So to be clear, I'm not convinced a syscall like this is needed, but I'm not going to oppose inclusion in the tree, regardless of implementation. This also means I'm not going to commit it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194985-8-Y71fcatwYU>