Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 May 1999 15:18:54 -1001
From:      richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk)
To:        hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Support for Symbios vs. Adaptect SCSI
Message-ID:  <199905280119.PAA24186@pegasus.com>
In-Reply-To: William Maddox <maddox@p-1.eng.sun.com> "Re: Support for Symbios vs. Adaptect SCSI" (May 27,  3:41pm)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
} > In general, the PCI interface on the Adaptec chips is unsurpassed
} > in the industry.
} ...
} 
} This is very helpful information.  It does make it clear that Adaptec
} makes sense at the high end.  You get what you pay for, etc...

I've seen test reports in the past that place the Symbios controllers
at a slight speed *advantage* over Adaptec.  (Sorry no references, too
long ago.)

Yes, the drivers could easily be the controlling factor.

By most reports the Symbios controllers are very good, and not
nearly as absurdly priced as Adaptec.

Symbios chips can be found embeded in everything from workstations
and pc's to large RAID units.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905280119.PAA24186>