Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:16:20 -0700 From: Chris Stankevitz <chrisstankevitz@gmail.com> To: Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD recommends not using base unbound for an authoritative server Message-ID: <CAPi0psvzigpXQfRf3bstKVCmk_b_5Sta=-n-6g3n9KxQDcBbVg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5509A055.6010701@my.hennepintech.edu> References: <CAPi0pssPrcJgF71AvQ-M1RZt=%2Btv=6FTGtwhi9_bX6-Q-7b7cQ@mail.gmail.com> <5508B8EB.3050907@gmail.com> <CAPi0psuy1swnCB%2B5NQbPrAAA=E3E377CcOPvvez%2Be4Ze6zuVZQ@mail.gmail.com> <5509A055.6010701@my.hennepintech.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> wrote: > That quote sounds like it came from a certain well-known troll blog. Andrew, I apologize for the confusion. The quote was my attempt at translating what "Jungle Boogie" was trying to explain in this thread. I created this entire thread in an attempt understand why the FreeBSD manual is telling me not to run the base-provided unbound daemon for outside users. I don't know if it is a security concern or other concern. Thank you, Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPi0psvzigpXQfRf3bstKVCmk_b_5Sta=-n-6g3n9KxQDcBbVg>