Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 13:41:54 +0000 From: Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>, apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache 2.2 ports Message-ID: <8c7c200293f6d84e756d6eec4a1edcc2@mail.feld.me> In-Reply-To: <8DF8037F-F9EC-488D-86C4-0923789C174C@adamw.org> References: <8DF8037F-F9EC-488D-86C4-0923789C174C@adamw.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
September 6 2014 10:24 AM, "Adam Weinberger" <adamw@adamw.org> wrote: > apache team - > > So it seems that setting USE_APACHE=22 doesn’t actually depend on apache-2.2. This means that every > USE_APACHE=22 port is broken, and as of right now won’t have any 10.1 packages. > > I’m happy to go through and add "DEFAULT_VERSIONS= APACHE=22” to this ports, but I wanted to check > with you guys first. Is that the right way to fix it? Is there something else that can be done to > make USE_APACHE=22 actually depend on apache-2.2? > FYI I had to solve this problem today with the following two make.conf options: DEFAULT_VERSIONS= apache=2.2 (note it's 2.2, not 22 -- bsd.default-versions.mk shows a period should be used) APACHE_PORT= www/apache22 Previously I only had the DEFAULT_VERSIONS entry and it worked fine. Suddenly I needed to add APACHE_PORT as well. This is with an up to date ports tree -- my packages build automatically every 8 hours.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8c7c200293f6d84e756d6eec4a1edcc2>