Date: 03 Jan 2003 14:51:42 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RC2 problems installing gnome2 Message-ID: <1041623502.325.41.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <20030103193550.2BBDA5D04@ptavv.es.net> References: <20030103193550.2BBDA5D04@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 14:35, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> > > Date: 03 Jan 2003 12:35:56 -0500 > > > > No. If you want to test what is to become 5.0-RELEASE, set your tag to > > RELENG_5_0. If you want to use -CURRENT, set your tag to '.'. > > > > For ports, however, your tag should always be '.'. > > I know that the ports are (almost) always taken from HEAD, but I > thought that the ports set for the release of 5.0 were tagged > RELEASE_5_0_0. I see no RELEASE_5_0 tag. Ports tagged for 5.0-RELEASE is RELEASE_5_0_0. However, when tracking ports, mist people want the dynamic '.' tag, and not the static release tags. Joe > > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) > Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) > E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1041623502.325.41.camel>