Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 11:42:56 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should I run -CURRENT? SNAP? Message-ID: <199804161842.LAA00669@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Apr 1998 19:41:15 BST." <353650CB.5FAD74C6@tdx.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > What I'm trying to get at - is it a good idea? - The box isn't _mission_ > critical, I don't mind it crashing, panicing etc. - but I'd rather not have > the filesystems hosed... -current right now seems to be quite stable. > If I find a SNAP that works well is it likely to stay 'working well' (I > know, how longs a piece of string?) - or am I better off staying 'really' > current? I tend to leapfrog; when I have a stable system I'll live with it until either I need/want to play with a new feature, or it just feels "really old" (usually 2-3 months). > Oh for SMP-Stable... <g> Testing and input from people like you is what it will take to achieve just exactly that. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804161842.LAA00669>