Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:51:21 -0500 (EST) From: Omachonu Ogali <oogali@intranova.net> To: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET> Cc: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net>, FreeBSD-STABLE <stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: xl0 packet dropping, still Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10002181150020.2306-100000@hydrant.intranova.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002180105480.3658-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have a machine here with 2 3C905B-TX's, during heavy traffic I get: xl0: command never completed! xl1: command never completed! I reverted to using my Intel EtherExpress PRO/100+'s and I'm fine here. On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Matt Heckaman wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using 3c905b-TX NICs in 4 servers here, all intels ranging from a beat > up p133 doing DNS, to a pII and a couple celerons doing various tasks. > These are interconnected via a Cisco 1548M, etc. I personally, have had > nothing but good expierence with these cards, I find it strange that this > many people are. > > Personally, I've always held 3com cards in high regard. For example, my > friend's company which runs a wide array of intel servers, netfinities > and whatnot, use strictly those 3com cards, I haven't heard of them having > any problems either. > > I /have/ however, seen an Intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100 give a machine > that I work with (FreeBSD) numerous problems upon problems for a while, > it's interesting how both sides of the fence have the opposite problems. > > Matt > -- > Matt Heckaman [matt@arpa.mail.net|matt@relic.net] [Please do not send me] > !Powered by FreeBSD/x86! [http://www.freebsd.org] [any SPAM (UCE) e-mail] > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: > > : Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 23:32:32 -0500 > : From: Jeffrey J. Mountin <jeff-ml@mountin.net> > : To: Omachonu Ogali <oogali@intranova.net> > : Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG > : Subject: Re: xl0 packet dropping, still > : > : At 10:47 PM 2/17/00 -0500, Omachonu Ogali wrote: > : >I've gotten reports of the 3Com NIC's dropping packets in all OS's using > : >an Intel CPU, it's more or less a sporadic problem I say... > : > : The 3Com's have higher collision rates (tested over long periods) and don't > : autsense most of the time, which the Intel does much better. > : > : Frankly I can't see anyone using a 3Com considering all the problems that > : crop up on the lists, but then I've been happy with Intel NIC since the > : Pro100B came out. ;) > : > : > : Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net > : Systems/Network Administrator > : FreeBSD - the power to serve > : > : > : > : To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > : with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > : > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Omachonu Ogali oogali@intranova.net | | Intranova Networking Group http://tribune.intranova.net | | PGP Key ID: 0xBFE60839 | | PGP Fingerprint: C8 51 14 FD 2A 87 53 D1 E3 AA 12 12 01 93 BD 34 | +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10002181150020.2306-100000>