Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:21:30 -0400 From: outro pessoa <outro.pessoa@gmail.com> To: Eric Furman <ericfurman@fastmail.net>, sorressean <tyler@tysdomain.com>, adrian@freebsd.org, wblock@wonkity.com, dru@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Hello Message-ID: <CAD9=5XxRJMmcpwCOf-tPRyCA0eqi2msg4OdQC0M5SRg7C8Z6tA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAD9=5XwxOhiEW9sYdi3w82Yce0Hpr2O0hk56aXd5m5A4ktrSTw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAD9=5XwxOhiEW9sYdi3w82Yce0Hpr2O0hk56aXd5m5A4ktrSTw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Now, some would call this -and have -off-topic noise; but, there is a reason for this post. Some of you do not think before responding to a post. The words that you choose need to be diplomatic and honest when you doubt another person's intention and/or reason for that person's reply. Your community is open. For some of you, your minds are not. It is time for a change in attitude and approach. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:53 PM, outro pessoa <outro.pessoa@gmail.com> wrote: > Seeing that you have quoted me from another email that I sent, my decision > is to inquire you on different topics. > Is the cognitive process the same for all members of the human species? > By which method(s) does the human animal learn? > By observation, each culture within an area has its own standards of > normality. The world view of each culture is dependent upon the experience > and understanding of the members of that culture. Education will coincide > with the perception of each member of any given society. Now, that which is > considered sane by the standards of one culture may be considered insane by > the standards of another. > In the scientific method, you must form a hypothesis and prove its > validity. > I will add this to Schrodinger's Paradox. > Being that you are able to observe the quantum event from different > perspectives, you will need to observe the same event from the viewpoint of > the subject if such is possible. Your first hypothesis is that the subject > seems incapable of logic and reasoning to such a degree that the subject's > perception of the events occurring is false and flimsy at best. > I have not experienced that which you have experienced and therefore I > have no right to make any assumption about your nature. > My reactions are erroneous ; yet, the reasons for my reactions are solid. > Your judgement of me is based upon your own experiences and knowledge. > The words "you" and "your" are both plural and general simultaneously. > > I have approached you openly and honestly, admitting to my faults. > Each day, I learn. > Because you are not me, I give you the benefit of the doubt - and, to > admit, this usually occurs after my reaction - when the situation becomes > more personal in nature. > > If you are not able to see the similarities between myself and another - > and this being due to a physical condition - and that your experience with > others has been negative because many do not think about anything but > themselves, it is understood. > > I apologize and attempt to approach differently. > > There are times that a person may have a question to the mailing lists and > that person is not addressed. > > I try to address the question to the best of my knowledge. Now, at times, > I am perceived erroneously by other members of this community. > > If I say, " please do not insult me publicly," that does not mean you have > the right to insult me at all. I did not do this to you. I would not and > have not condemned you if anything has happened to you personally. > My "threat" was a reaction to your disrespect. > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAD9=5XxRJMmcpwCOf-tPRyCA0eqi2msg4OdQC0M5SRg7C8Z6tA>