Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:57:27 -0400 From: John Lyon <johnllyon@gmail.com> To: Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> Cc: Thomas Mueller <mueller6722@twc.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can Ethernet and wi-fi be used concurrently? Message-ID: <0E52F8AC-FFEF-4D69-A377-32F0015667E4@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <f3275b02-f1f2-765f-a8f4-f5df3070d655@bluerosetech.com> References: <5d0ed525.1c69fb81.d673e.e3dfSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <C146F26C-8D38-4A3D-A8E4-79DAC1EC4F90@gmail.com> <f3275b02-f1f2-765f-a8f4-f5df3070d655@bluerosetech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for the clarification. It was late at night where I am and I missed that he wants to keep the link active for intranet access even if it fails for internet access. That’s what happens when you read at night. Best, Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 22, 2019, at 10:57 PM, Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> wrote: > >> On 2019-06-22 19:05, John Lyon wrote: >> You should be able to use the lagg driver to combine the two >> interfaces in failover mode to achieve your goal. > > lagg doesn't apply here because Thomas's issue is routing failover. The master interface would remain up for intranet access.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0E52F8AC-FFEF-4D69-A377-32F0015667E4>