Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 10:01:52 +0100 From: Frank Nobis <fn@radio-do.de> To: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does floppies work with 384MByte RAM ? Message-ID: <20001116100152.A1561@radio-do.de> In-Reply-To: <200011160338.eAG3cTG72325@whizzo.transsys.com>; from louie@TransSys.COM on Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 10:38:29PM -0500 References: <3822.974328625@critter> <200011160338.eAG3cTG72325@whizzo.transsys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 10:38:29PM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote: > > I've got a Dell dual-Pentium-III XEON system at work that I was running > -current on. Some time ago (didn't notice when exactly, sigh) when > building new kernels, I started getting > > isa_dmainit(foo, bar) failed > For me it is a ASUS P2B-DS with 512M RAM. I see the same isa_dmainit failed with full ram utilized. With MAXMEM set to MAXMEM="(464*1024)" it is working under current. With 480M it is failing. I looked through the sources and found that contigousmalloc can't find a page of physical ram under the 16M margin. But I am not vm wizzard enough, to understand what the difference is with MAXMEM set to some lower value than the real amount of memory. Regards, Frank -- ~/.signature not found: wellknown error 42 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001116100152.A1561>