Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:51:20 +0200 From: "Zeus Panchenko" <zeus@ibs.dn.ua> To: "=?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3Futf-8=3FB=3FS2FybGkgU2rDtmJlcmc=3D=3F=3D?=" <Karli.Sjoberg@slu.se> Cc: "freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: why no automount for one zfs? Message-ID: <20141104085120.81576@smtp.new-ukraine.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 4 Nov 2014 06:06:40 %2B0000 <5F9E965F5A80BC468BE5F40576769F099DF85BC1@exchange2-1> References: <20141104072923.79140@smtp.new-ukraine.org> <5F9E965F5A80BC468BE5F40576769F099DF85BC1@exchange2-1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Karli Sj=C3=B6berg <Karli.Sjoberg@slu.se> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 07:29 +0200, Zeus Panchenko wrote: > To have ZFS filesystems mounted at boot, first of all, "canmount" must > be on (check) and then you have need to have: thanks, yes it is (and it is mentioned in `zfs get all' output in my initial post) > zfs_enable=3D"YES" > in "rc.conf". Then there=C2=B4s also the question how the parent filesyst= ems > "/home/zeus" and "/home" are mounted? Are they also ZFS? my case is root-on-zfs, one pool and no other fs except ZFS all other fs (ZFS) are mounted correctly =2D-=20 Zeus V. Panchenko jid:zeus@im.ibs.dn.ua IT Dpt., I.B.S. LLC GMT+2 (EET) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlRYd2cACgkQr3jpPg/3oypKXQCg7NgekXt4erT9iD4WfT5xnmrm FcMAnRzBMLv1H+5dJgKeS4hm2u89XMu8 =RAkG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141104085120.81576>