Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Jul 1997 17:13:32 -0700
From:      Eddie Fry <eddie@eaznet.com>
To:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: T1/T3 Upgrade Options?
Message-ID:  <33C6CC2C.F1B@eaznet.com>
References:  <3.0.32.19970711171140.00e09220@etinc.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

dennis wrote:
> 
> At 11:37 AM 7/11/97 -0400, you wrote:
> >>>> A major factor to consider is that its very difficult to do 86Mbs (T3 is
> >>>> full duplex) with an addon card on the PCI bus because the sustained
> >>>> throughput rate is often pretty low. Other bus masters (ethernets, for
> >>>> example) will futhur reduce the burst capability. While PCI bursts to
> >>>> 128MB/s, very few PC products have sustained throughput rates over
> 100Mb/s.
> >>>> If you have a 100Mbs ethernet card on the same bus (you'd have to) the
> >>>> number is cut in half. plus bus masters can't be controlled so you have
> >>>> contention issues.
> >>>
> >>> Contention issues I'll agree with for the most part, however.. My
> >>> calculations are (correct me if I'm wrong):
> >>>
> >>> T3 Card = ~12Mbytes/sec [ 90Mbits/sec]
> >>> Ether   = ~25Mbytes/sec [100Mbits/sec]
> >>>           =============
> >>>           ~37Mbytes/sec
> >>>
> >>>   132 Mbytes/sec  - PCI bus
> >>> -  37 Mbytes/sec  - Interfaces
> >>> ================
> >>>    95 Mbytes/sec  - Left to play with.
> >>
> >> Because you have no clue how the PCI bus really works (and that burst
> >> rates are not sustainable), your Math is totally invalid.
> >> Remember that ISA is a 64Mb/s medium and if you get 30Mb/s you
> >> are lucky....the numbers are even more dramaticly worse when you add
> >> bursts to the formula as with PCI.
> >
> >Invalid?  I doubt it... In "real-life", how often do *MOST* T3 connections
> >"sustain" 45Mbit/sec throughput in each direction?
> 
> this depends on who your selling to. If you're building a card for little
> weenie ISPs who only have 4Mb/s requirements, then maybe. But I think
> that big ISPs have pretty busy links, and we're only talking about 2 or
> 3 large, consecutive packets to potentially have a problem.
> 
>  >In "real-life", how
> >often do ethernet cards "sustain" 100Mbit/sec throughput in each direction?
> >I think my figures are right on the money, however.. Let's assume for a
> >minute that you can only achieve 50% throughput on the PCI bus for whatever
> >reason.. Assuming that the ethernet and the T3 card were running full tilt
> >(Very, very unlikely in most situations) then with 1 ethernet and 1 T3 port
> >you still have ((132Mbytes/2)-37Mbytes) = 29 Mbytes left over just for
> >lolly-gagging around...
> 
> "Bursts" are typically only a few words, so the rate you are using is just
> totally invalid for this computation.
> 
> 50% is still pretty good (sustained 2 cycle accesses)...and still bursts so
> only a few words......
> 
> >
> >> Ah, if life was only as easy as your trivial account of the world!
> >
> >This sounds a little bit sarcastic Dennis... This would *really* encourage
> >me to purchase your products.  A "Your a dumb-ass, we're not" attitude.
> 
> Its very sarcastic  :-)
> 
> YOU'RE the one with the "you dont know what you're talking about" attitude,
> which is OK if you're right, but you're not. Have you designed a PCI card
> lately?
> 
> Dennis

Can you guys take your personal jabs off this list?  I'm not saying your
discussion isn't relevant, but the personal jabs are not needed.

Thanks,

Eddie




home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33C6CC2C.F1B>