Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:10:01 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=NgMN2nL9JQxUMiarwVRenB%2Bo%2B2swhr_=zGOrc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8639qt1mx1.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <201011212351.oALNpTti096816@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <4CE9B77B.20007@FreeBSD.org> <8639qt1mx1.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/11/22 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no>: > Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> As far as I can tell the current state of the code builds just fine, >> so I'm wondering what the current problem with the tinderbox is. > > No weasel words, please. > > The tinderbox is complaining about these function definitions: ... > These are real errors which were introduced in r215615 and fixed in > r215642 with a highly misleading log message. > > See for yourself: ... Looks like the latest run on pc98 is ok, so we should be in the clear for n= ow. Thanks! -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=NgMN2nL9JQxUMiarwVRenB%2Bo%2B2swhr_=zGOrc>