Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:44:55 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: yuri@rawbw.com Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Port linux_dri has incorrect packaging list Message-ID: <47563512@bb.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <4A2B4E14.9040809@rawbw.com> (yuri@rawbw.com's message of "Sat\, 06 Jun 2009 22\:20\:20 -0700") References: <4A2B4E14.9040809@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:20:20 -0700 Yuri wrote: > I have linux_dri-7.0_1 installed. > pkg-plist has the line /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 and > pkg_info -L linux_dri-7.0_1' shows > /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 but there no such file in the > file system. > Insteas there is: > ls -l /compat/linux/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root users 15 Jun 6 13:05 > /compat/linux/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.180.60 Take two. As danfe@ said at ports@ x11/driver-nvidia does not touch files at LINUXNASE/usr/x11/lib, it installs libraries to LINUXBASE/usr/lib. I can only quess here but by any chance did you experiment with non default linux base/ports at this host? The question if all nvidia-drivers should be marked as conflict with all linux dri ports remains. Even though some of those ports use different files/directories it seems that libraries should not exist at a system at one time... > As a result automatic port upgrade of may ports depending on Linux > libGL.so fails and attempts to reinstall linux_dri and fails because > it's already installed. > portupdate looks for /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 for some > reason, it's not there and it decides to install linux_dri and fails. > Please fix this, I'd say that you may try to deinstall/reinstall linux_dri port. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47563512>