Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:07:28 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD/alpha kern.flp flood Message-ID: <20030402215049.G26531@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20030402104439.GA26900@sunbay.com> References: <20030329190908R.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <3E857E9C.F7476A32@mindspring.com><20030331150348.GD21700@sunbay.com> <20030402151519.U25349@gamplex.bde.org> <20030402104439.GA26900@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 03:24:59PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 06:03:48PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > Anyway, I've committed the fix to release/Makefile that strips > > > > the .comment section out from the BOOTMFS kernel. If you have > > > > ... > > > Why can't the bits be built with -Dlint to remove rcsid's. > > > > This would make little difference, since using __FBSDID() or rcsid[] > > in kernel sources is a style bugs, and most of the sources are missing > > this style bug. > > > I'd hardly call it a bug, since style(9) explicitly says C files > should use __FBSDID(). Another bug. __FBSDID() is is not normally used in the kernel. E.g., rev.1.1 of almost every file in libkern is about removing (sccs) id strings since their bloat is not wanted in the kernel. It is true that __FBSDID() and suitable stripping can handle this more configurably, but no one ever cared enough to change n,000 $FreeBSD$'s to __FBSDID()'s in the kernel (ugh) or provide infrastructure (#define lint doesn't count) for stripping the ids. > > Most of the savings from stripping commits is from removing verbose compiler > > id "GCC: (GNU) 3.2.1 [FreeBSD] 20021119 (release)". > > > And I wondered why I get so huge savings where only few files > put $FreeBSD$ into a .comment by way of __FBSDID(). Sure, > ``objdump -s -j .comment kernel'' is full of these. > > David, can we get rid of the .comment section for the normal > builds too, or at least not put these long GCC strings into? They bloat programs and libraries too. I once saved a MB or so in the root partition by just by removing a couple of useless words in these ids. I like having these ids in object files and static libraries but not duplicating them in executables and shared libraries. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030402215049.G26531>