Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:12:25 -0500 From: "Andrew Duane" <aduane@juniper.net> To: "Stanislav Sedov" <stas@freebsd.org>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ARM Jazelle support Message-ID: <0FCFCF6165E968449991746EB91D614D0198415E@antipi.jnpr.net> References: <491EEDA6.7040309@incunabulum.net><20081115.095838.1649769600.imp@bsdimp.com> <20081116000124.4c5adf1b.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmmm, at my last company, we had full Jazelle support for our ARM9 product, and I don't think we had any NDA agreements in place. We were using the TI OMAP chips, and we just folded Jazelle support right into our OS without any problems. If someone wants, I can contact the people involved (I didn't directly work on Jazelle, but I was in the OS group). -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org on behalf of Stanislav Sedov Sent: Sat 11/15/2008 4:01 PM To: M. Warner Losh Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARM Jazelle support -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:58:38 -0700 (MST) "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> mentioned: > > When I looked at Jazelle support, the context switch stuff was well > documented, but the rest of the magic needed to make it work was under > NDA. Has that changed? > Nope, the Jazelle technology is still closed. You'd need binary-only components from ARM Limited to utilize Jazelle. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkkfOKgACgkQK/VZk+smlYGDUwCdFdG37ZzS3Xv5xFOB3yULiTt2 6Z4Anil32rROcXiIUa5zop3YElpZ1zJG =UQ30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-embedded To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-embedded-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0FCFCF6165E968449991746EB91D614D0198415E>