Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:14:19 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 215830] lib/libfetch regression
Message-ID:  <bug-215830-8-iWg2dWIgMZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-215830-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-215830-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215830

--- Comment #4 from John Hein <z7dr6ut7gs@snkmail.com> ---
(In reply to Dag-Erling Sm=C3=83=C2=B8rgrav from comment #3)

The OP was claiming that something changed in libfetch after 6.4-RELEASE.  =
The
broken Harvard ftp server was just his way to empirically observe that
hypothesis.  However, I could not reproduce his observation that 6.4 is
different in this regard.  Perhaps there is an environment difference on his
end of which he was not aware.

As such, the end result (closing this bug) is the same, but the reason for
closure is subtly different (it could be more specific than "not a bug", but
rather "unable to reproduce" - that is, we can't reproduce his reported suc=
cess
on 6.4, so it appears to _not_ be a post-6.4 behavior change).

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-215830-8-iWg2dWIgMZ>