Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 17:49:40 -0800 (PST) From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, smp@csn.net, opsys@mail.webspan.net, jak@cetlink.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0-RELEASE? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980302174740.6855E-100000@shell.uniserve.com> In-Reply-To: <199803022311.SAA14774@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2 Mar 1998, John S. Dyson wrote: > > I think whatever is released should support low granularity SMP, at > > the very least. I would be *very* unhappy with having to bump the > > version number to 4.0 in the process (it implies too long a time frame, > > and it's frankly too large a number to allow the software to appear > > trustworthy, IMO. Cv: SVR4). > > > Well, think of it like this: > 3.0 simple SMP. > 3.1 much better SMP. How is it that Linux has moved so much faster in this area? Or have they? It seems to me that they even have kernel threading too, although it seems to me that their threads are a bit heavy (almost pseudo-processes). > -- > John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, > dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, > jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980302174740.6855E-100000>