Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 14:19:46 +0300 From: Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: trociny@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk> Subject: Re: Proposed MFC to hastctl: compact 'status' and introduce 'list' command Message-ID: <20130524111945.GB12310@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305241407010.26794@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <E1UfopM-0002S8-V2@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305241407010.26794@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 02:08:28PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Pete, > > On Fri, 24 May 2013, Pete French wrote: > > > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291 > > ... > > > The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related scripts > > > which one use in production. > > > > > > Any chance we could do this is 2 stages - first being to add 'list' to give us a chnace > > ti change scripts over, then make the chnages to 'status'. I have scripts > > which try and parse the outut from 'status' which will need changing, > > and I sspect I am not the only one... > > I see no problem with this, as it is one-lite patch (modulo usage/manual page > changes); it would be direct commit to -stable, but as it is temporary, I see > no problem there too. > > Mikolaj, your opinion? It looks like a very good idea. -- Mikolaj Golub
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130524111945.GB12310>