Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:33:21 +0200 From: Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib Makefile.inc src/lib/libatm Makefile src/lib/libautofs Makefile src/lib/libbegemot Makefile src/lib/libbluetooth Makefile src/lib/libbsm Makefile src/lib/libbz2 Makefile src/lib/libc_r Makefile src/lib/libcrypt ... Message-ID: <467313B1.7070507@dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <200706151630.20867.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200705210249.l4L2n8KS097032@repoman.freebsd.org> <200706151630.20867.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > On Sunday 20 May 2007 10:49:08 pm Daniel Eischen wrote: >> deischen 2007-05-21 02:49:08 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> lib/libautofs Makefile > > This isn't connected to the build AFAICT. > >> Log: >> Bump library versions in preparation for 7.0. >> >> Ok'd by: kan > > Was this bump supposed to be exhaustive? The following libraries haven't been > bumped relative to 6.x: > > - libalias > - libbsnmp > - all the snmp_*.so modules I'm probably not up-to-date with the handling of version numbers, but I would think that the snmp_*.so modules version numbers are meant to reflect the API version that these modules use (which is implemented by bsnmpd). This hasn't changed, so what would be the reason to bump that number? Same for libbsnmp. harti > - libdialog.so.5 > - libgnuregex.so.3 > - libhistory.so.6 > - liblwres.so.10 > - libncurses.so.6 > - libncursesw.so.6 > - rest of ncurses was bumped > - libpam.so.3 > - all the pam_*.so modules > - libreadline.so.6 > - libssh.so.3 >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?467313B1.7070507>