Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:49:30 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Cc: eivind@yes.no, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/netscape4-navigator Makefile ports/www/netscape4-navigator/files md5 netscape.sh ports/www/netscape4-navigator/pkg PLIST Message-ID: <199809221649.SAA05608@gratis.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of " Tue, 22 Sep 1998 09:14:00 MST." <199809221614.JAA08170@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> References: <199809221614.JAA08170@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
wrote: > * 4.05 has security problems (any random web-page can execute anything > * it pleases, IIRC). This is IMO more important than any other > * reliability issue. > > Duh. Should I just mark it broken then? Naah. Even if the software is a bit ropey, as long as it's not hopelessly broken, let's let the users bang on it. If the software will not work or of it has a big security hole, then that is a good cause for marking BROKEN IMO. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809221649.SAA05608>