Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 19:37:21 -0800 From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> To: Pierre.Beyssac@hsc.fr (Pierre Beyssac), steve@visint.co.uk (Stephen Roome) Cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BIND 8.1.1 Message-ID: <199711260337.TAA28668@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> In-Reply-To: Pierre.Beyssac@hsc.fr (Pierre Beyssac) "Re: BIND 8.1.1" (Nov 25, 1:46pm)
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 25, 1:46pm, Pierre Beyssac wrote: } Subject: Re: BIND 8.1.1 } According to Stephen Roome: } Making BIND 8.1.1 the default under FreeBSD 2.2.x has the drawback that } it would break existing 2.2.x installations relying on BIND 4.x configs. Yes, and there is also the issue of what to do about the IRS library is someone else has mentioned. I vote against changing the 2.2.x BIND from 4.9.x to 8.1.x, but 3.x is a different kettle of fish. BTW, there are a number of patches floating around for 8.1.1 which should be included if this version is integrated. You might want to wait for 8.1.2 which appears to be in the works since I just got a confirmation message that one of my patches will be included. --- Truck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711260337.TAA28668>