Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:36:09 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) Message-ID: <200102130136.f1D1a9W33904@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:32:15 PST." <200102130132.f1D1WFU56412@mobile.wemm.org> References: <200102130132.f1D1WFU56412@mobile.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200102130132.f1D1WFU56412@mobile.wemm.org> Peter Wemm writes: : Warner Losh wrote: : significance to the naming at all. The versioning is done at link time : by the libfoo.so -> libfoo.so.N symlink. Ah. That's different. If it is that easy, then my objection is withdrawn. I wasted about 3 days trying to untangle a version downgrade, but now that I think about that was in the 2.x days when we had a.out libs. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102130136.f1D1a9W33904>