Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:52:51 +0200 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r220983 - head Message-ID: <34A34338-79E0-435E-9BF1-614D10FC9FC7@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <E5C45DAC-6014-42E2-9E1C-BFB7D54EBCB4@bsdimp.com> References: <201104240923.p3O9N8QG025386@svn.freebsd.org> <20110424161933.GA18775@vniz.net> <18B3AE1E-467E-4B23-81B9-AB1EDEFE1F7A@gsoft.com.au> <E5C45DAC-6014-42E2-9E1C-BFB7D54EBCB4@bsdimp.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 25/04/2011, at 6:55, Warner Losh wrote: >> The best way is to change to use GPT IDs (/dev/gptid/xxx) if you are on a GPT system) or UFS IDs (/dev/ufsid/xxx) if you can't. > > I've been running with ufs labels for a couple of years now, since the first rumblings of this hit the streets. They work great no matter what the underlying partitioning scheme. The one drawback is that if you have multiple disks with the same labels, then the first one wins. Normally not a problem, but when you have it, you need to ensure the right one is selected. I avoid this problem by prefixing a hostname to the label... This is why I prefer IDs since they are nominally unique (UFS ones, GPTs damn well better be :) Although I concede it is rather annoying to work out which is which, or type them out manually.. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8Chome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34A34338-79E0-435E-9BF1-614D10FC9FC7>