Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:56:16 +1200 From: Berend de Boer <berend@pobox.com> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Terrible NFS4 performance: FreeBSD 9.1 + ZFS + AWS EC2 Message-ID: <87d2qt1tof.wl%berend@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <580122426.2916694.1373242759482.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> References: <87y59i0yni.wl%berend@pobox.com> <580122426.2916694.1373242759482.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Jul__8_17:56:16_2013-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>>>>> "Rick" == Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> writes:
Rick> Please try this patch:
Hi Rick,
Could you please reroll the patc hagainst 9.1-RELEASE? Not sure what
version of FreeBSD you made this for. I have 9.1-RELEASE. Get three
failures:
# patch --check -p0 < ~/drc4.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c.orig 2013-01-07 09:04:13.000000000 -0500
|+++ fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c 2013-03-12 22:42:05.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 160.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 216.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 271.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 357.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 370.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 381.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 396 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 426.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 444.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 468.
Hunk #11 failed at 476.
Hunk #12 failed at 501.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 523.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 531.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 547.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 568.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 579.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 601.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 665.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 674.
Hunk #21 failed at 683.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 718.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 729.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 750.
Hunk #25 succeeded at 779.
Hunk #26 succeeded at 788.
Hunk #27 succeeded at 803.
Hunk #28 succeeded at 828.
Hunk #29 succeeded at 927.
Hunk #30 succeeded at 943.
3 out of 30 hunks failed--saving rejects to fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdport.c.orig 2013-03-02 18:19:34.000000000 -0500
|+++ fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdport.c 2013-03-12 17:51:31.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdport.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 59 with fuzz 1 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 3284 (offset -22 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 3351 with fuzz 1 (offset -5 lines).
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- fs/nfs/nfsport.h.orig 2013-03-02 18:35:13.000000000 -0500
|+++ fs/nfs/nfsport.h 2013-03-12 17:51:31.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file fs/nfs/nfsport.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 547 (offset -62 lines).
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- fs/nfs/nfsrvcache.h.orig 2013-01-07 09:04:15.000000000 -0500
|+++ fs/nfs/nfsrvcache.h 2013-03-12 18:02:42.000000000 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file fs/nfs/nfsrvcache.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 41.
done
I just want to make sure I can apply it cleanly and that it's not a
mistake I made when making this work when it doesn't.
--
All the best,
Berend de Boer
------------------------------------------------------
Awesome Drupal hosting: https://www.xplainhosting.com/
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Jul__8_17:56:16_2013-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)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=4I0l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Jul__8_17:56:16_2013-1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87d2qt1tof.wl%berend>