Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:42:44 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: mark@grondar.za, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step6, corresponding /etc/pam.d/* fixes for review Message-ID: <20020121154244.GC37234@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <xzpsn8zwwey.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20020121142038.GA36519@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpsn8zwwey.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 16:33:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > 1) there's no reason to have pam_opie commented out now, it won't do One reason still exist: all users (i.e. non-OPIE too) will see OTP responses when pam_opie will be uncommented. It may leads to confusion or wrong automated scripts processing. I have idea to solve it adding "no_fake_prompts" option to pam_opie to control that per admin choice. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020121154244.GC37234>