Date: Sat, 5 Jul 1997 09:50:54 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Adam David <adam@veda.is>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sbin@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/init init.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970705094831.869V-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970705024852.19887A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 5 Jul 1997, =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jul 1997, Adam David wrote: > > > > death: revoke all lines listed in /etc/ttys instead of sending HUP > > > to all processes > > > > This assumes /etc/ttys never changes while the system is up, which is > > not necessarily true. > > No, it not assume this. Most recent /etc/ttys used here. There is a small chance that /etc/ttys is modified, but init not HUPed before a shutdown. Would it not be more appropriate to revoke the processes being watched, rather than reading from /etc/ttys? /* Daniel O'Callaghan */ /* HiLink Internet <http://www.hilink.com.au/>; danny@hilink.com.au */ /* FreeBSD - works hard, plays hard... danny@freebsd.org */
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970705094831.869V-100000>