Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:00:22 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, Evren Yurtesen <yurtesen@ispro.net> Subject: Re: E:Attach to pid 54301 failed: Function not implemented Message-ID: <20090919190022.3b046b1a@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <20090919100724.1165f685@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <4AB4016D.5070508@ispro.net> <4AB4035E.2030907@ispro.net> <20090919100724.1165f685@ernst.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:07:24 +0200 Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> wrote: > On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:02:06 +0300 > Evren Yurtesen <yurtesen@ispro.net> wrote: > > > Evren Yurtesen wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am trying to use the Intel Software Development Emulator on > > > FreeBSD 8 > > > > > > http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-software-development-emulator/ > > > > > > > > > with the linux_base-f10 port however I am getting the following > > > error: > > > > > > # ./sde -- /bin/csh > > > E:Attach to pid 54304 failed: Function not implemented > > > > > > Is this something which can be fixed or should I forget about it? > > > > > > > It could probably be fixed, but it may require lots of effort. > > The arguments to the Linux ptrace(2) are different (some are pointers > instead of ints) and it wouldn't surprise me in the least to find that > ptrace(2) in Linux behaves differently than under FreeBSD. > > > I just realized this in logs also: > > > > linux: pid 54303 (pinbin): syscall ptrace not implemented > ptrace _was_ implemented for Linux at some point. See sys/i386/linux/linux_ptrace.c. -- Alexander Kabaev [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKtWKLQ6z1jMm+XZYRAqXgAKDgYBQCMhapt8L0TLzWFRZGvV8B8ACfW9q2 oC3tDfNMAkf4iiCXG+mDXIE= =ia53 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090919190022.3b046b1a>