Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:07:54 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Marcin Cieslak <saper@saper.info> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 not responding on some aliases (recent 8-stable) Message-ID: <F2005BBF-1808-4E63-B5F3-71361A95008A@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <slrnjf53o4.2d1.saper@saper.info> References: <slrnjf53o4.2d1.saper@saper.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22. Dec 2011, at 01:59 , Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I upgraded my Nov 2010 8.x-something machine to Dec 4th and later Dec 19th
> userland and kernel:
>
> FreeBSD x.saper.info 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Dec 19 22:13:54 UTC 2011 root@x.saper.info:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/IPSEC amd64
>
> Machine has 6 IPv6 addresses configured (out of provider-supplied /64 range).
> rtsol is used to get link-local default gateway, but addresses are static.
>
> What happens:
>
> After boot, SOME IPv6 addresses do not respond to anything (ICMPv6 ping, netcat...),
> for example:
>
> 2001:abcd:f:abcd::1000 does not work
> 2001:abcd:f:abcd::1001 works
> 2001:abcd:f:abcd::1002 works
> 2001:abcd:f:abcd::1003 does not work
> 2001:abcd:f:abcd::1004 works
> 2001:abcd:f:abcd::1005 does not work
>
> after a reboot it changes a bit, for example :1000 starts working
to cut the long story short and before we try to debug this in detail;
if you try to reach all these addresses on the local machine, does that work, eg. if you ping6 2001:abcd:f:abcd::100[0-5] from that host itself?
Is it just that you cannot reach them from outside your local network?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F2005BBF-1808-4E63-B5F3-71361A95008A>