Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:28:18 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        George Neville-Neil <gnn@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Navdeep Parhar <np@FreeBSD.org>, net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Interface MTU question...
Message-ID:  <4FFF1742.9010906@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <C06D346A-97BE-4498-B4E5-0ED85731A8BD@freebsd.org>
References:  <86liiqrnnq.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <4FFDF6C7.3030301@FreeBSD.org> <C06D346A-97BE-4498-B4E5-0ED85731A8BD@freebsd.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

While y'all are looking at MTU (which is an increasingly important topic
as we move into a Gig+ world) I'm wondering what our support is for
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4821 ?? I asked this a while back and
never got an answer.

This method of PMTUD is really important given the massive (stupid)
brokenness of people routinely blocking all of ICMPv4.

Doug


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FFF1742.9010906>