Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:42:10 +0400
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Cc:        Darren Reed <darrenr@FreeBSD.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: panic: kmem_malloc(131072): kmem_map too small (AMD64)
Message-ID:  <20070924144210.GA82735@team.vega.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20070924080347.O84223@thebighonker.lerctr.org>
References:  <20070921102946.T11189@borg> <46F415BF.9010500@FreeBSD.org> <20070921140550.D96923@thebighonker.lerctr.org> <46F41CFF.6080108@FreeBSD.org> <46F58799.1030702@freebsd.org> <46F58B21.8030307@FreeBSD.org> <20070924091558.GB32006@team.vega.ru> <46F78C59.1020801@FreeBSD.org> <20070924080347.O84223@thebighonker.lerctr.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 08:04:33AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 
>> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:37:37PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>>> Darren Reed wrote:
[...]
>>>>> Stupid question, perhaps, but is vm.kmem_size/vm.kmem_size_max limited 
>>>>> by physical RAM?
>>>> Yes.
>>> To be precise, it's actually limited by 2 * sizeof(physical RAM).
>>> It's still size of a _virtual_ memory map (kmem_map), after all:
>>> :	/*
>>> : 	 * Limit kmem virtual size to twice the physical memory.
>>> : 	 * This allows for kmem map sparseness, but limits the size
>>> : 	 * to something sane. Be careful to not overflow the 32bit
>>> : 	 * ints while doing the check.
>>> : 	 */
>>> : 	if (((vm_kmem_size / 2) / PAGE_SIZE) > cnt.v_page_count)
>>> : 		vm_kmem_size = 2 * cnt.v_page_count * PAGE_SIZE;
>> 
>> Well OK, but that seems pretty dangerous, because it leaves open a pathway 
>> to exhaust all of physical memory and presumably panic.
> 
> is KVA pageable?  Is the kmem_map dedicating non-pageable memory?
> 
kmem_map is used to map memory for the zone allocator, including
malloc(9).

> I've set my vm.kmem_max to 1G, (on a 4G amd64 box).  Is that reasonable?
> 
It just means that your kernel can "malloc" up to 1G of memory.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070924144210.GA82735>