Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 21:01:57 +1000 From: Gavan McCormack <tetragon@bitey.cyber.com.au> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS question.. Message-ID: <37356B25.DC23929@bitey.cyber.com.au> References: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9905082352270.11097-100000@shell.uniserve.ca> <373544F8.2CA1CFBD@bitey.cyber.com.au> <37355B45.6F9B43B5@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > Gavan McCormack wrote: > > > > I have been hearing around that NFSv3 is the only 'good' NFS, and so far no > > > This isn't right either. FreeBSD has had NFSv3 for quite some time. It > > I assume you mean in -CURRENT? This is the -STABLE list remember. :) Still, > Wrong. AFAIK, even 2.2.x has nfsv3. But only in 3.x the default Ok, so this list likes to keep me guessing. I assume then that NFSv3 cant do per-directory exporting? Or it just dosent make a difference on any version of BSD4.4? Or, I am just doing something wrong? Someone wanna clear the situation up before I install RH5.2?? (The original question being, can I export on a per-directory basis from my 3.1-STABLE machine, without exporting the entire local filesystem?) > Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) -- ________________________________________________________________________ Gavan A. McCormack - tetragon@cyber.com.au - tetragon@bitey.net Cybersource P/L. TCPIP network management & Unix system administration. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37356B25.DC23929>