Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 15:18:01 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Houben,G.J.J. (Geert)" <G.Houben@fontys.nl> Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: pam already installed in Freebsd 4.2 ? Message-ID: <20010304151801.C37701@mollari.cthul.hu> In-Reply-To: <C1E0E1EF0987D3119E720008C70D266601800AA5@fontmail02.fontys.nl>; from G.Houben@fontys.nl on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 06:37:08PM %2B0100 References: <C1E0E1EF0987D3119E720008C70D266601800AA5@fontmail02.fontys.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ZwgA9U+XZDXt4+m+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 06:37:08PM +0100, Houben,G.J.J. (Geert) wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Does someone know if pam is default installed in FreeBSD 4.2 > I think yes, because there is a pam.conf file and some libpam files. > But when I try to compile an extension in Php4 the pam_auth the it give > this error: > *** > configure:31534: checking for pam_start in -lpam > configure:31553: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lpam -lpam -ldl > -lm -lcrypt 1>&5 > /usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -ldl > *** >=20 > I hope someone can help me with this. The configure script is bogus - it's checking for libdl which is a Solarisism and doesn't exist on FreeBSD, even though both have PAM. Kris --ZwgA9U+XZDXt4+m+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6os0pWry0BWjoQKURAlK+AJ94QajlKxL3BWa7WigxbfG+gAszcwCfWQPH Ehx4Aw/UVkl2QLRErPPuezA= =Oicy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZwgA9U+XZDXt4+m+-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010304151801.C37701>