Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:42:48 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: dudu@dudu.ro Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FIB separation Message-ID: <20110717.004248.48765964696292481.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <A718ADB2-EC52-462C-A114-85053F1B2E55@dudu.ro> References: <A718ADB2-EC52-462C-A114-85053F1B2E55@dudu.ro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Sun_Jul_17_00_42_48_2011_981)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Vlad Galu <dudu@dudu.ro> wrote in <A718ADB2-EC52-462C-A114-85053F1B2E55@dudu.ro>: du> Hello, du> du> A couple of years ago, Stef Walter proposed a patch[1] that enforced du> the scope of routing messages. The general consesus was that the best du> approach would be the OpenBSD way - transporting the FIB number in the du> message and letting the user applications filter out unwanted du> messages. du> du> Are there any plans to tackle this before 9.0? I am looking into this and investigating other possible extensions in rtsock messages such as addition of a fib member to rt_msghdr. I am not sure it can be done before 9.0, though... -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Jul_17_00_42_48_2011_981)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk4hsXgACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1r7ACfbgol4iQfmS6VrGRpxJXyNJhh c3IAnRTg+4PdOqLwm9jkL6HZApfW/SiA =UC+i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Jul_17_00_42_48_2011_981)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110717.004248.48765964696292481.hrs>