Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Oct 1997 11:23:58 -0500
From:      Richard Scranton <scrantr@ix.netcom.com>
To:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: questions-digest V3 #502
Message-ID:  <3454C01D.7C9@ix.netcom.com>
References:  <199710270751.XAA24094@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
More likely, memory interleaving is hosed because of the different sized
chips.  Same suggestion - go back to 16 megs.  -rs

> 
> From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 19:47:13 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: Re: new RAM question
> 
> try backing down to 16
> 
> maybe your board only caches 16MB? (if it's old?)
> remember a single cache miss is bad.. I've had this on a 486 motherboard..
> the manufacturer had a PAL upgrade for the cache controller.
> 
> On Sun, 26 Oct 1997, Dean wrote:
> 
> > BSDibes,
> >       I've got a 486 DX-33 with a 486 (I think) motherboard.  Friday, I went
> > from 8 Megs to 20 Megs of RAM - from eight 1 Meg sims to four 4 Meg and
> > four 1 Meg sims.  I've got eight 30 pin slots.  Well, the problem is that
> > my system now crawls - like it is only recognizine the four 1 Meg sims.  I
> > just installed FreeBSD, so I assume I've got the latest version.  I didn't
> > think that there was anything I had to do in addition to ploping in the
> > sims.  Any ideas?  Thanks,
> >       Dean
> >

-- 
___________________________________________________________________
Richard Scranton - LDA Systems - Information Management Consulting
scrantr@ix.netcom.com  Columbus Cincinnati Cleveland Toledo Atlanta
<http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8c38c4cf>;
My Employer: <http://www.lda.com/columbus/>;



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3454C01D.7C9>