Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:42:23 +0200
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
To:        mdf@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: MTX_DEF versus MTX_SPIN
Message-ID:  <4CD190EF.5080600@icyb.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=12-dSAZ21DbZgw36YbRGiUq4KZbyCx3SjucPG@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTi=12-dSAZ21DbZgw36YbRGiUq4KZbyCx3SjucPG@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 03/11/2010 18:27 mdf@FreeBSD.org said the following:
> It's not clear to me from the man pages (perhaps I didn't look at the
> right one?) in which environments I need a spinlock.  For example, I
> wouldn't think it's safe to use a MTX_DEF in a hard interrupt handler
> (i.e one that was registered with BUS_SETUP_INTR), but I see some code
> lying around here that does it and nothing I'm aware of has broken.

Such a handler runs in an interrupt thread.
The "harder" interrupt handler is called interrupt filter in FreeBSD terminology.
 I think that it was formerly known as fast interrupt.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CD190EF.5080600>