Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 22:20:16 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (Andrey A. Chernov) <ache@nagual.ru> Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-lib@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc Makefile Message-ID: <199608131420.WAA23475@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Aug 1996 17:58:37 %2B0400." <199608131358.RAA01761@nagual.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= wrote: > > First, we dont need to bump the minor number this time since it's already > > been done this development cycle.. (in fact, the major has been bumped) > > This has been the policy since before 2.0.5 was released... ie: "one > > version bump per development cycle". > > > Second, don't forget to update the libc_r Makefiles, as they need the new > > file as well. > > Oops.. It seems I miss something... Please clarify, what I need to do > exactly: back out minor bumping or bump libc_r too? My suggestion is to revert the minor increment before much time has passed, it's only a few hours. If it is a bigger deal than I think, it can easily be re-bumped again. libc_r has it's own set of Makefile.inc's, and when you add one file to libc, you need to do the same to libc_r. And also keep the version numbers in sync. Cheers, -Peter > -- > Andrey A. Chernov > <ache@nagual.ru> > http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608131420.WAA23475>