Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 20:30:17 +0100 From: Nils Holland <nils@tisys.org> To: GB Clark II <gclarkii@vsservices.com> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The alternate FPUEMU (was: IBM's intentions with JFS (was: IBM suing (was: RMS Suing was [SUGGESTION] - JFS for FreeBSD))) Message-ID: <20011217203017.C48114@tisys.org> In-Reply-To: <01121711054200.65128@prime.vsservices.com>; from gclarkii@vsservices.com on Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:05:42AM -0600 References: <3C186381.6AB07090@yahoo.com> <20011217111835.A43375@tisys.org> <3C1DDB26.62969FFB@mindspring.com> <01121711054200.65128@prime.vsservices.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:05:42AM -0600, GB Clark II stood up and spoke: > > Yes, for modern hardware it is of little concern, however, > please note that the "GNU" FPU is not actually under the GPL! Sorry, when I stated the example with the GNU FPU emulator I was not really aware of this fact. Anyway, it even makes me glad that things are like that and that the code is not genuine GPL code. As a side note, I guess I never really used it on one of my machines, though ;-) Greetings Nils -- Nils Holland Ti Systems - FreeBSD in Tiddische, Germany http://www.tisys.org * nils@tisys.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011217203017.C48114>