Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Feb 2023 03:56:24 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
To:        Daniel Engberg <diizzy@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: 6bf569405440 - main - net/dante: mark BROKEN
Message-ID:  <Y/WSaJoruJEqEGye@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <e88aab02918c7ad55c669f456bd672fa@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202302201203.31KC3qsN091230@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <Y/WHGVL6N%2BRgdept@FreeBSD.org> <e88aab02918c7ad55c669f456bd672fa@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 04:40:57AM +0100, Daniel Engberg wrote:
> On 2023-02-22 04:08, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 12:03:52PM +0000, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> >> commit 6bf569405440272aff81cf898684e189427ee885
> >> 
> >>   net/dante: mark BROKEN
> >> 
> >>   checking read/send-side pipe system... =>> Killing runaway build
> >>   after 7200 seconds with no output
> > 
> > I think this had been fixed last year, but not merged to stable
> > branches?
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265087
> 
> Still failed on main too according to
> https://portsfallout.com/fallout?port=dante&maintainer=&env=&category=&flavor=

Interesting, so the bug had not been fixed entirely?

> That being said, we do have alternatives in tree.

Yes, we do have other SOCKS proxy ports in the tree, but not all of
them expose bugs in FreeBSD itself, i.e. being canaries in the mine.

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Y/WSaJoruJEqEGye>